Skip to main content

Why's Leftist Environmentalist Mike Lewis implying TFP's De Oliveira is a Fascist?

Might leftist environmentalist Where Peter Is's Mike Lewis be implying that Plinio Correa de Oliveira is a Fascist because he doesn't know what he's talking about?

The anti-Hitler and anti-Communist de Oliveira who founded Tradition, Family and Property (TFP) in 1942 wrote:

"Hitler prefers the advance of Russia to the Anglo-American coalition. Defeated, he tries to influence the configuration of tommorow's world. This is his ultimate crime."
(O Legionario, 23 August 1942)

Leftist always want to pretend that Hitler wasn't a Socialist like them and preferred the Socialist Communist Russians to the non-Socialist Anglo-American coalition.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church as well as the Triumph of the Sacred Heart of Jesus and the Immaculate of Mary.

Comments

Aqua said…
If you look at the real fascists of the 20th century - their demagogic propensity to stir up the violent emotions of the crowd, and as a pack of enraged wolves target that deadly emotion toward the object of their hatred, separate out the weak and the innocent - it is the leftists that are in violent alignment with that behavior.

And the lies ... always blaming the “other” for their own moral vacuum.

They don’t fool anyone anymore, except themselves. Mike Lewis is preaching to his own choir. Once you accept an antipope and his Pachamama Baal as a god, you are in a dark, dark place if you profess to be Catholic. Expect a spiritual fruit not so sweet or nutritious.
9:35 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more