Skip to main content

Is Cdl. Tobin Signaling "Correct[ion]," possibly Excommunication, for those who Oppose Gay Bishops Network, Pachamama Idolatry & Communion for Adulterers?

Francis collaborator Cardinal Joseph Tobin after meeting with "the successor of Peter," who according to Crux "declined to investigate" sex abuse charges against homosexual predator Theodore McCarrick, appears to be signaling that the Francis Vatican may be pushing for "correct[ion]," possibly excommunication, of orthodox Catholics who oppose the McCarrick gay bishops network, Pachamama idolatry and Communion for adulterers:

Crux reported:

"Tobin told his brother bishops, they might want to look at "how we might correct those among us who would separate us or separate portions of the Church from the successor of Peter.'"
(Crux, "Cardinal Tobin reportedly declined to investigate McCarrick misconduct rumors," September 2, 2018 and "New Jersey, Pennsylvania bishops spend Thanksgiving with pope," November 29, 2019)

The Catholic News Agency (CNA) reported:

"In the testimony, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano... claims... Tobin's appointment to Newark '[was] orchestrated by McCarrick, Maradiaga and Wuerl.'"
(CNA, "Vigano testimony receives mixed response from US bishops, August 27, 2018)

It appears that Francis collaborator Tobin is a orchestration of the homosexual McCarrick bishops network.

It, also, appears that the McCarrick gay bishops network may be ready to start a persecution of all orthodox Catholics who oppose the McCarrick gay bishops network, Pachamama idolatry and Communion for adulterers which a big part of the agenda of the Francis Vatican.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Tobin: "how we might correct those among us who would separate us or separate portions of the Church from the successor of Peter."

He's upping the ante, for sure. But I can't say I mind too much. If he gets his way, I imagine it would only make the division between the Catholic Church and Anti-Church even clearer. In fact, I'd be very surprised if penalties were not coming for the faithful soon. At least then the wheat will be better separated from the chaff, and the lambs from the goats.
11:53 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
Yes I hope the excommunications from Cardinal Bergoglio who styles himself ‘Francis’ and his minions in the Homosexual Network Strangling the Church start to fly. Clarify the lines, as you say, Cam.

Where can I get mine?
9:01 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
9:08 PM
BrotherBeowulf said…
St Francis Xavier

Antipope Francis has cut himself off from Christ, there’s where the chasm lies.

But that’s not a problem for Tobin, who’s an open-secret practicing sodomfolk. Remember Francesco Castiglione?

Until we get rid of every Understudy of McCarrick, Friend of ‘Francis’, and member of the hierarchy and priesthood who is also now—or ever has been—a member of the clericalHomosexual Network Strangling the Church, our Church will never be purified, or at peace.

St Francis Xavier—from that halcyon age when Jesuits were men—pray for us.

9:11 PM
Alexis Bugnolo said…
Excommunication from the high priests of Sodom would be an inestimable eternal honor! Bring it on!
8:10 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more