Skip to main content

Thanks, Cd. Brandmuller for calling the Couragaous "Idol... Remov[ers]... Prophets;" Now you have a Moral Obligation to be a Couragaous "Prophet" & Issue the Dubia Correction

Today, LifeSiteNews reported that dubia cardinal, Cardinal Walter Brandmuller, said:

"These two young men who threw these tasteless idols into the Tiber... These two couragaous 'Macabees' who have removed the 'horrors of the devastation of a holy site' are the prophets of today."
(LifeSiteNews, "Couragaous... prophets of today': Dubia cardinal praises men who threw Pachamamas in Tiber, October 29, 2019)

Now, Cardinal Brandmuller, you have a moral obligation to issue the formal correction that was promised if it became "necessary" according to the other dubia cardinal, Cardinal  Raymond Burke, if the five dubia questions weren't answered specifically the first dubia question against "persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion."
(OnePeterFive, "Remaining Dubia Cardinals Take the Next Step Towards Formal Correction," November 14, 2017)

In 2015, you, Cardinal Brandmuller stated:

"Whoever thinks that persistent adultery and reception of Holy Communion are compatible is a heretic and promotes schism."
(LifeSiteNews, "Dubia Cardinal: Anyone who opens Communion to adulterers 'is a heretic and promotes schism,'" December  23, 2016)

St. Thomas Aquinas demanded:

"If the faith were endangered a subject ought to rebuke his prelate even publicly. Hence Paul, who was Peter's subject, rebuked in public, on account of the imminent danger of scandal."
(Summa Theologiae ll-IIae, 33,4,2)

"Ought" means you have a duty or a moral obligation to make a formal canonical correction of Francis for the scandal of Communion for adulterers and now for the scandal against the First Commandment of, as you said, for the Vatican's bringing the "idols... 'horrors of devastation... [into] a holy site'" which you know Francis fully approved.

According to the greatest Doctor of the Church St. Thomas Aquinas, you, Cardinal Brandmuller have the duty or moral obligation to be a couragaous "prophet" and issue the canonical formal correction immediately to Francis.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.






Comments

Robert F Scott said…
Amen. Well said.
2:20 PM
Praypraypray said…
Ditto! I second what Robert F Scott said.
8:54 PM
Alexis Bugnolo said…
What I do not understand is how there is so much attention and thought over so many things, and all the while people refuse to admit that munus does not equal ministerium, neither in a latin dictionary nor in the code of canon law. And entire Academic Conference demonstrated that at Rome last week....see the transcript at https://vericatholici.wordpress.com/2019/10/22/conferenza-sulla-rinuncia-di-papa-benedetto-xvi-interventi/ and the key argument was in English...
9:54 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more