Skip to main content

In Sex Abuse Pope Francis admitted "I made Serious Mistakes... due to lack of Truthful and Balanced Information," now he must admit Serious Mistakes" in Amoris Laetitia or he will be called the WORST POPE IN HISTORY

In the Bishop Juan Barros sex abuse case, Pope Francis admitted he made serious errors because of his inner circle, the famous "magic circle," gave him false and unbalanced information. He said:

"I made serious mistakes... due to lack of truthful and balanced information."

Vatican expert Robert Royal said to EWTN's Raymond Arroyo that the information came from the "magic circle" or inner circle that advises him.

Francis now has to admit that he "made serious mistakes... due to lack of truthful and balanced information" from his inner circle in his Amoris Laetitia.

If the Pope thought he couldn't endure the push back on the Barros sex abuse case and he thinks that the push back on Amoris Laetitia will not increasingly get greater, he is seriously getting a "lack of truthful and balanced" information from his "magic circle" if he thinks all faithful Catholics will not increasingly opposed him for the rest of his life.

He needs to see like in the Barros cases that it is only going to get worst for him as each month goes by as more Catholics are seeing at the moment that he is the WORST POPE IN HISTORY and they are praying.

Only those Catholics who are totally ignorant or those who willfully desire to destroy the moral law of the Church don't oppose Amoris Laetitia.

Anyone that can read knows that he is teaching the 100 percent opposite of Pope John Paul II on giving Communion to public adulterers because of "conscience" making exceptions when there are absolutely no exceptions in Veritatis Splendor and Familiaris consortio both of which are based on infallible Divine law and Church moral law.

Francis and his inner circle are attempting to overthrow and destroy the infallible moral teachings of the Church and Divine law, that is God's law.

Francis if you don't admit you made "serious mistakes" now, not only are you going to lose in total disgrace by the Hand of God, but all future Catholics are going to call you the WORST POPE IN HISTORY.

A million times more terrifying than that for you Francis is your death for if you only fear the secular media and not God then you are to be pitied because soon you will be facing the Living God.

Pray an Our Father now, in total confidence knowing God will win this battle for us, that every faithful Catholic oppose Amoris Laetitia in prayer and in anyway God gives them the grace to defend His Divine law.



Comments

Praypraypray said…
The sex abuse case was frowned upon by the powers that be in the media and the world, including those who like things so-called “politically correct”.
However, that same group is fine with Amoris Laetitia. I doubt you will see any rush to apology or blaming the “magic circle” for AL, since AL is OK according to the media and the powers that be in the world. They could care less about the Catholic Church or its teachings. They don’t care if people living in mortal sin receive Holy Communion. Pathetically, they don’t even seem to blink when horrendous attacks are done on the Holy Eucharist and posted online on YouTube. Many of the powerful and worldly seem to be vehemently anti-Catholic and so they do not seem bothered at all by any attack on the Sacraments or upon Jesus in the Holy Eucharist. So I doubt that you’ll see any of them pressure or attack the Vatican or Bergoglio to change or get rid of AL.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...