Skip to main content

Enabling Media & SNAP are Accomplices in Francis's McCarrick Cover-up, their Credibility is Shot

- Updated August 26, 2018 -

The secular and liberal Catholic media as well as leftist such as the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP) have been involved in a massive cover-up of Pope Francis after each of his serial sex abuse cover-up scandals.

Almost all the sex abuse enabling media agreed with pro-gay National Catholic Reporter journalist Thomas Reese's whitewashing of Francis's cover-ups which was posted on the SNAP website saying:

"The overwhelming consensus in the media is that Pope Francis has a blind spot when it comes to sexual abuse."
(snapnetworks.org, "Pope Francis' blind spot on sexual abuse," Religious News Service, January 25, 2017)

Now, they are at it again, with the Vatican's former Apostlic Nuncio Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano's report that Francis covered-up the sex abuse crimes of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick.

Most all of them are enabling Francis's sex abuse cover-up by down playing the devastating 11-page report and many by using the word "claims" when the most credible of witnesses saw and reported that the Pope covered-up for possibly the most senior sinister Church sex abusers in history.

Imagine if a senior official of Donald Trump's campaign were to say that he had worked with the Russians in a similar 11-page report.

Imagine if Pope Benedict XVI had even in media spin appearance had covered-up for a Cardinal or anyone as Francis covered-up for McCarrick.

Imagine if a credible witnesses such as a former Apostlic Nuncio had reported that Benedict had not only covered-up, but made the predator Cardinal his most trusted advisor.

There is no need to imagine what SNAP and the media would do.

In 2010, SNAP held demonstrations in front of the Vatican and the media "called for Pope Benedict's resignation" after the New York Times made false sex abuse cover-up allegations against Pope Benedict.
(PRI.org, "Italian police anticipate Vatican unrest," March 26, 2019 & National Catholic Register, "'The Pope Must Resign'? Bishops Respond," March 29, 2010)

The Catholic League in an ad published in the New York Times in 2010 responded to the calls for the Pope Benedict to resign:

"The Times has teamed up with Jeffery Anderson, a radical lawyer who has made millions suing the Church (and greasing professional victims' groups like SNAP), so they can weaken its moral authority. Why? Because of issues like abortion, gay marriage and women's ordination."

The secular media, the liberal Catholic media and SNAP are now involved in a massive covering-up for Pope Francis.

They have lost their credibility in their Francis sex abuse cover-up.

There is no doubt that the secular media, the liberal Catholic media, leftists and SNAP are accomplices in Francis's sex abuse cover-up.

If they don't call for Francis's resignation like they did for Benedict's resignation then their credibility is shot.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...