Skip to main content

Was Chile a Trap? Or is Francis another Fly in Parolin's Spiderweb?

Who set up the obvious trap for Pope Francis to go to Chile where he had much to lose and nothing to gain?

It appears to some who watch Francis closely that he seems to gives lip service to protecting unborn children and sex-abuse victims, but awards pro-abortionists and protects bishop friends such as for example Chile Bishop Juan Barros who covered-up for a gay priest predator friend as attorney Elizabeth Yore has documented.

The trip to Chile was set up by someone who either didn't have Francis's best interests in mind or is oblivious.

Who set up the trip?

Francis expert John Allen at Crux said "if you want to put something on Francis's agenda... there's only one game in town." ("More and more Parolin's the face of authority in Francis's Vatican," August 10, 2017)

That one game is Secretary of State Cardinal Pietro Parolin who is the Pope's gatekeeper and "agenda" setter.

Did the "agenda" setter set up the papal trip to Chile?

It appears to some that the Secretary of State could possibly be a corporate or Church ladder climber.

What possible rung of the ladder could be on the mind of a Vatican Secretary of State?

Sandro Magister said Parolin has a "very realistic chance of becoming" the "next pope." (lancasterdiocese.org, Latest News, October 10, 2017)

The one who stood in Parolin's way in his climb up the ladder before this was Cardinal George Pell who was suppose to reform the Vatican corruption including the Secretary of State's finances.

Parolin according to the Catholic Herald in a "series of power struggles" ended the outside audit and Vatican financial reform "even before" Pell was forced to return to Australia on old sex-abuse allegations. ("How Cardinal Parolin won the Vatican civil war," November 9, 2017)

Who and what stood in the Secretary of State's path before Pell?

The Grand Master of the Knights of Malta Fra' Festing and his Order were in his path.

In a series of power struggles Festing was forced to step down and the Order's sovereignty ended.

OnePeterFive.com posted Vatican expert Edward Pentin "reports that Cardinal Parolin, who seems to be orchestrating a good deal of the Vatican's involvement in the matter" of Malta. ("Malta Besieged: Ancient and Sovereign Order Toppled by Rome," January 26, 2017)

In both the Pell and Malta power struggles dubious and suspicious financial as well as spying actions were taken by a former employee and a present employee of Parolin (Archbishop Becciu and Archbishop Tomaso) according to the OnePeterFive.com article quoted from above and LifeSiteNews.com in its September 28, 2017 article "Former Vatican auditor accused of spying says 'shady games' going on in Rome."

Pray a Our Father now that the Dubia Cardinals and Pope Benedict XVI issue the correction and that Parolin is not the next pope.












Comments

Liam Ronan said…
I pray God publicly rebuke them everyone, the ignorant, the malicious, and the cowardly who allow Almighty God, the Blessed Mother, and the Doctrine of the Holy Catholic Church to be mocked, manipulated, warped, and distorted in such a manner as to substitute man for God.

I pray they be rebuked not that they perish in Hell, but that in rebuking them, God grant them the opportunity to be saved.

Hebrews 12:6 “For whom the Lord loveth, he chastiseth; and he scourgeth every son whom he receiveth….”

Revelation 3:19 “Such as I love, I rebuke and chastise. Be zealous therefore, and do penance….”

Gather your willing Dubia Cardinals, Bishops, and priests together, Cardinal Müller, Bishop Schneider, et. al. however few there be, and have just 1 public Mass offered for that intention, i.e. a public call for God to rebuke those who insult God’s Majesty and the Bride of Christ, as an act of Mercy that they might repent.

Offer that 1 Mass on March 19, 2018, the Feast of St. Joseph the Protector of the Universal Church and the 5th anniversary of Francis’ installation.
Praypraypray said…
Pray! Pray! Pray!

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...