Skip to main content

Obama Would Back Killing Grandchild by Abortion: "Don't Punish Them With a Baby"

Barack Obama Would Back Daughters' Abortion, "Don't Punish Them With a
Baby"

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
March 31, 2008

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Barack Obama is drawing gasps from
pro-life advocates today over comments he made during a campaign stop in
Pennsylvania over the weekend. The leading Democratic presidential
candidate appeared to back a potential decision by his daughters to seek an
abortion saying he wouldn't "punish" them with a baby.

Obama's comments came in the context of off-the-cuff remarks addressing
the issue of AIDS. (see them here)

The candidate indicated he favored teaching both abstinence education
as well as sexual education and he appeared to be hard-pressed to come
up with something else to say when he brought up his daughters.

"When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention
is education, which should include -- which should include abstinence
education and teaching the children -- teaching children, you know, that
sex is not something casual," he said.

"But it should also include -- it should also include other, you know,
information about contraception because, look, I've got two daughters.
9 years old and 6 years old," he added.

"I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if
they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby," Obama
said.

David Brody, a correspondent for CBN News, noted the comments and said
he was surprised by Obama's candor.

"I understand Obama was talking off the cuff and these were not
prepared remarks. I also know that when you're on the campaign trail 20 hours
a day you will say something you wish you hadn't," Brody wrote on his
blog.

"But still. 'Punished with a baby?' That just doesn't sound right," he
added.

"Why use the word punished? I would think that word would be alarming
to people and possibly offensive to those who have had babies out of
wedlock," he wrote.

Brody said Obama brought up abortion again later on in the speech and
referred to his daughters as "miracles."

"This is a very difficult issue, and I understand sort of the passions
on both sides of the issue. I have two precious daughters - they are
miracles," Obama said.

Brody contacted the Obama campaign for a response and heard back from
Bill Burton, his national spokesman.

Burton largely ignored the "punishment" remark and merely said Obama
favored reducing teen pregnancies and abortions and restated Obama's
comments about his daughters.

"What Senator Obama said and what he believes is clear -- children are
'miracles,' but we have a problem when so many children are having
children," Burton said.

"As Senator Obama said on Saturday -- and on many other occasions --
parents have a responsibility to teach their children about values and
morals to help make sure they are not treating sex casually," Burton told
CBN News.

Obama's remarks are likely to add another reason to the list pro-life
advocates are developing as to why he won't get their vote this
November.

They appear to align him squarely with abortion advocates who view laws
protecting unborn children as "punishing" pregnant women by forcing
them to give birth to the baby instead of taking the child's life through
abortion.



_________________________________
Are you receiving this newsletter
from a colleague? If you want your
own FREE subscription,
Click here to SUBSCRIBE:
join-baby@mh.databack.com

To UNSUBSCRIBE, just click here:
leave-baby@mh.databack.com and
you'll be automatically removed.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...