Skip to main content

"Pro-Life" Casey is Pro- Abortion

"The moral of this story: Never trust a Democrat, even if he says he is pro-life."

DrFrank@abortiontruths.net writes:
Regarding the following:

Well, what did you expect? What few pro-lifers there are in the Democratic party have to toe the party line. And that line is: Never feel sorry for unborn children, as the mothers have the right to have them killed.

Why Bob Casey Jr. didn't switch to the Republican party knowing the Democratic party's affinity for the killing of unborn children is mind boggling, especially after they made a fool out of his own father.

Did he think he was going to change this "Party of Death," into becoming pro-life. When hell freezes over. Satan has a firm grip on his "pride and joy."

As usual, the party comes first and Bob Casey just confirmed this. The people in Pennsylvania were hood-winked by Casey. Where are you Rick Santorum?

The moral of this story: Never trust a Democrat, even if he says he is pro-life.

Frank Joseph MD

DrFrank@abortiontruths.net
http://www.abortiontruths.net

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


"Pro-Life" Casey Votes Twice to Enable US Funding for Abortion Overseas

By Meg Jalsevac

WASHINGTON, DC, September 14, 2007, (LifeSiteNews.com) - Last week Senator Bob Casey, Jr. (Democrat-Pennsylvania) actively contradicted his largely pro-life campaign promises by voting to approve a funding appropriations bill that would provide US funding to foreign organizations that promote and provide abortions.

The funding bill (HR 2764) would effectively overturn the Mexico City Policy, a foreign aid policy which expressly prohibits the funding of overseas agencies involved in abortion. The policy was first adopted by President Ronald Reagan and continued in the presidency of Bush, Sr. President Clinton repealed the pro-life policy on the first day of his tenure but the current President Bush reinstated it as one of his own initial acts in office.

Casey voted in favor of an amendment sponsored by ardently pro-abortion Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) which not only permitted but actually increased funding to overseas agencies which provide or refer for abortions.

On the same bill, pro-life Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) introduced a conflicting amendment to maintain the Mexico City Policy when allocating foreign funding. Surprisingly, just 20 minutes after his vote to increase funding to foreign abortion agencies, Senator Casey also voted to approve Brownback's amendment and to uphold the Mexico City Policy but later admitted that second vote was an error on his part.

However, according to National Review, just days later Senator Casey returned to the Senate floor to address his contradictory vote saying, "it was my intention to vote 'nay' [to upholding the Mexico City Policy]. Therefore, I ask unanimous consent that I be permitted to change my vote since it will not affect the outcome of that vote."

Diane Gramley, President of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania commented on Casey's recent votes. "Senator Bob Casey, Jr. has recently shown some confusion on his stand on the abortion issue. But apparently he does not have the pro-life convictions that his father did. Bob Casey, Sr. paid for those convictions, but apparently his son does not have the backbone to stand up to pressure from the Democratic leadership."

Senator Casey's father was a prominent and well-respected Pennsylvania Democratic senator who was known for his support of the pro-life movement. Casey, Sr. was denied a speaking opportunity at the 1992 Democratic National Convention because he intended to deliver a speech that illustrated his support of life.

Casey's recent votes are disappointing to pro-life individuals who expected a more pro-life commitment from him especially in light of his campaign promises and 2004 Voter Guide questionnaire answers.

In answer to questions posed by Voter Guide before the 2006 elections, Casey stated that he was "Opposed" in the following categories: Public funding of abortion, a woman's 'right to abortion and tax-funded abortion. Casey also indicated that he "supports legal protection for human life from conception."

According to the National Review Online, Casey's spokesman Larry Smar replied to inquiries regarding the pro-abortion votes saying, "[Senator Casey] does not support public funding of abortion." Smar insisted that Senator Casey is holding true to his campaign promise to work to reduce the overall number of abortions and that the amendment that he voted in favor of "would not allow public funding of abortion."

According to the terminology of Boxer's amendment, the US foreign aid would not be allocated specifically - by the US - for abortion services. However, the aid would go to abortion providing 'family planning' agencies overseas to be used as necessary.

As previously reported by LifeSiteNews.com, Cardinal Justin Regali addressed the Senate before the funding appropriations vote in a letter in which he stated that "the new congressional leadership has endorsed the general consensus that Congress should work to 'reduce abortions.' Unfortunately some of the means proposed, such as expanded contraceptive programs, have been shown to be failures at achieving this goal and pose other moral problems. However, we should at least be able to agree that such efforts are hollow if programs to reduce abortion must be implemented through organizations that perform and promote abortions."

President Bush has promised to issue a veto if the funding appropriations bill disregards the Mexico City Policy.

To respectfully contact Senator Casey at his Washington, DC office:

383 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-6324
Toll Free: (866) 802-2833
Fax: (202) 228-0604

Or by email click on the following link:
http://casey.senate.gov/contact.cfm

Read the entire National Review Online article:
http://article.nationalreview.com/...

Read Previous LifeSiteNews.com Coverage:

Democrat Dominated US Senate Votes to Resume Funding to International Abortion Agencies
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07091301.html

Casey Ran as "Pro-Life"; His First Act Seeks "Sexual Orientation" Hate Crime Law
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2006/nov/06111403.html ;





_______________________________________________


To subscribe, send an email to:

pgoltz@nexiliscom.com with the word SUBSCRIBE in the subject.

To unsubscribe, send an email to:
pgoltz@nexiliscom.com with the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject.

Use of these words is critical so that your message doesn't get lost. This is a temporary arrangement. Please do NOT put this email address on any lists, or send unsolicited material to her. Thank you.

If you have difficulty, please email
pgoltz@nexiliscom.com .

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...