Skip to main content

"At the End of My Life What Would I Want to Give God"

"At the End of My Life What Would I Want to Give God"

Father John Joseph Halloran is a retired priest living in Santa Clara. He presently helps at parishes as well as visiting the sick and dying in the Bay Area.

Q. What made you decide to become a priest?

A. It started with thinking about it in high school because of the gratitude I had to God for my family and faith. The thoughts came that we have a certain number of years to live and at the end of my life what would I want to give God.

I often thought of careers in engineering and other fields. But in the end of my life -- not in a morbid way -- what would be the most satisfying life. It came to me that the most satisfying life would be the service of God as a priest.

After consulting priests, I decided to enter the seminary after high school. Entering the Mater Dolorosa Seminary in Hillsdale, Illinois in 1940, I was ordained in Chicago in 1948. Most of my priesthood has been as diocesan priest. I've been a priest for 53 years. The 53 years of priesthood have been happy ones.

Q. What was the toughest time you had as a priest?

A. The adjustment from teaching high school and college students in America to teaching 4th grade and up elementary students in Australia was tough.

I didn't make the adjustment too well (laugh). It was a humbling experience. I didn't feel I was teacher of the year. The needed to prepare in high school and college is in a specialized subject, but in the 4th grade the need is to do the whole nine yards -- reading, writing, etc. To take the fourth grade students though six to eight subjects a day and try to keep them from getting distracted is tough. I was greatly helped by the Irish Christian Brothers who showed me how to adjust to the English model of teaching. There are differences between the American model and English model. One difference is that from the fourth grade on boys must be taught by man -- that is by a priest or brother.

Q. What did you do after your work in schools?

A. From 1962 to 1965, I worked with the Propagation of the Faith parish appeals and also in vocational guidance work. After which, I did mostly parish work in Hawaii until I retired in 1977.The work in Hawaii parishes was most satisfying because I saw so many ethnic groups -- Chinese, Koreans, Filipinos, etc. -- of different backgrounds working together as the one body of Christ in one parish.

Q. Why did you decide to retire in the Bay Area?

A. I have a brother and other family in the area. And I always wanted to be in a place where there is a need. Here there are many opportunities to be of help. On my elderly and sick visits, I've seen how the Lord gives so many people quiet peace at the moment they are called from this life. This happens over and over, again. It helps to know that your presence helps them with the peace of the Lord at the end.

Click here for Credit Card and Amazon Order of Fred Martinez's book "Hidden Axis":

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1410746186/qid=1099936755/sr=11-1/ref


For your FREE copy of Hidden Axis click here:

http://hiddenaxisofevil.blogspot.com/


To see other articles go to:

http://fredmartinez.blogspot.com/


http://catholicmonitor.blogspot.com/


http://thefredmartinezreport.blogspot.com/


http://themeaningofloveandlife.blogspot.com/


"http://fred-martinezsthoughtsverses.blogspot.com/"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...