The Catholic Monitor

One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec is giving me some good laughs. Today, on Twitter, Skojec seriously wrote: "[A] pope universally accepted upon his election is infallibly certain. A dogmatic fact." "Francis was universally accepted. That's a dogmatic fact." He is claiming that it is "dogmatic fact" that Francis's papal validity "is infallibly certain," but the funny thing is that he said on Twitter on September 3 that he believes the Vatican I infallible dogma of papal "infallibility appears to be tautological [meaningless circular reasoning or logical fallacy] at best and borders on superstition [a unfounded belief] at worst." So, apparently, Skojec's "infallible certain" belief in the "dogmatic fact" of Francis's papal validity is meaningless circular reasoning or a logical fallacy "at best" or a unfounded belief "at worst." Humor aside, the ironic thing is that ...

Leftist Catholic Dawn Eden never stops claiming that anyone who doesn't 100 percent support her beloved Francis's Amoris Laetitia Communion for adulterers or thinks his upcoming Amazon Synod is heretical is not a real Catholic. Ethnically Jewish Eden's trump card on anyone who doesn't 100 agree with her is to call them a anti-Semitic or in other words: "Shut up, anti-Semitic!" One Peter Five publisher Steve Skojec never stops claiming that anyone who doesn't 100 percent support his infallible dogma that the Francis conclave was beyond any doubt valid and dares to claim that there is a possibility it was invalid is not a real Catholic. The self proclaimed traditionalist Skojec's trump card on anyone who doesn't 100 percent agree with him is to call them schismatic or in other words: "Shut up schismatic!" (Is it possible Francis got his whole new "shut up, schismatic" strategy from Skojec and his Twitter collaborator ...

Remember when Francis and his collaborators cry "SCHISM" it means they are AFRAID! What are they afraid of? They are AFRAID that it will finally get through the cowardly and apparently not too bright heads of the few faithful bishops that: Zero valid popes in the history of the Catholic Church have committed the sacrilege of instituting as the Vatican's official teaching that unrepentant adulterous couples can profane the Holy of Holy Jesus Christ who is true God by having unrepentant sinners receive Him in the Most Holy Eucharist. Nor have any of ALL the valid popes in history even come close to ambiguously teaching such a blasphemy which could be taken in either a orthodox or heretical way (for all the conservative and traditionalist Francis apologists). Next to this sacrilege against the Most Holy Eucharist, the proposed Amazonian Synod heresy of women's ordination is a minor sacrilege. Maybe these cowardly and apparently not too bright bishops might, ...

St. Francis de Sales: "[Y]ou are in reality between Heaven and hell... according to your choice, one or the other will be your final end." "... Jesus Christ looks down... 'Come, My child, My beloved, come... enjoy the everlasting happiness... of My Love.'" "... I renounce hell and all it torments... I turn myself heart and soul towards Heaven... O Jesus... Thy Love, which purchased for me my place in Heaven by the shedding of Thy Precious Blood upon the Holy Cross... I desire nothing else but to love Thee and bless Thee forever." Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church and the conversion of all sinners. Holy Mary Mother of God pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death. Amen.

The future heretical Amazon Synod is a unprecedented crisis which means the faithful bishops must forcefully act to forestall it. The best way to preempt this disaster is to act now. We already know beyond a shadow of a doubt that " Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical" according to Bishop Rene Henry Gracida and Bishops Bernard Fellay as   Catholic theologian Dr. John R. T. Lamont, Pd. D. shows: "The AAS statement thus settles an important and much-debated question. It establishes that Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia has affirmed propositions that are heretical in the strict sense... In the AAS statement, he [Francis] has required Catholics to give religious assent of mind and will to the assertion that Amoris laetitia contains propositions that are heretical... It would be sufficient to take the lesser step of simply addressing the faithful to condemn Amoris laetitia as heretical. Aside from Bishops Bernard Fellay and Henry Gracida, no Cathol...

- Vatican I expert Fr. Chad Ripperger, PhD, in his book "Magister Authority" shows that almost all Francis apologists be they liberal, conservative or traditionalist are "proximate to heresy": "[T]reating ALL papal statements as if they are infallible... is proximate to heresy because it rejects the precise formulation of the conditions of infallibility as laid out in Vatican I... by essentially saying the pope is infallible regardless of conditions..." "... Worse still, those who were to follow a pope who was in error in a non-infallible teaching which is taught contrary to something that is infallible is not, therefore, excused." (Magisterial Authority, Pages 5-14) - Pope Innocent III (1198-1216) in "Si Papa": "'Let no mortal being have the audacity to reprimand a Pope on account of faults, for he whose duty it is to judge all men cannot be judged by anybody, unless he should be called to the task of having deviated ...

  http://rosarytotheinterior.com/ By James Larson                              Woe to you who build the monuments of the prophets: and your fathers killed them….That the blood of all the prophets which was shed from the foundation of the world, may be required of this generation. (Luke 11: 47-50) While reading the Gospels, it might often appear that the Pharisees present themselves to us as proverbial “deer in the headlights”. Much of the time, their subterranean betrayal and malice were hidden behind real incomprehension. Theirs was the “What have we done wrong? – we have only been faithful to God’s tradition” look. Their unconscious betrayal was the result of building centuries of “monuments” (both physical and spiritual) that appeared God-like, but which in reality dulled, obscured, and finally profoundly falsified the Spirit of God...

http://rosarytotheinterior.com/ By James Larson The Amazonian Synod and Teilhardian Evolutionary Theology, And What is Necessary for Our Lady’s Triumph.   Note: The following article is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the profound “operation of error” (2 Thess. 2: 10) which is now being orchestrated by means of the Amazonian Synod to wash over the universal Church and the minds and hearts of all believers through Teilhardian evolutionary theology. The second part proposes the only remedy in the intellectual realm as contained in the theology and metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas. The third part examines the only complete remedy: a united recourse to Mary and her Rosary, as the means by which each one of us, including the hierarchy, may be purified of our sins, infidelities, and prostitutions to the errors of this world. Over half of the voting-age Cardinals have now been appointed by Francis. And even among those appointed previous to Francis, virtually...

In Mozambique, on September 7, Francis said: "Young, rigid priests... take this attitude... from the museum." (Church Militant, "Clergy and Laity offer Strong Response to Pope's 'Rigid' Comments," September 13, 2019) Why is the old Francis so antagonistic and the archenemy of young priests who are rigidly upright and erect in upholding the infallible teachings of the Church? Is it because he is against erecting or building up the Church on the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Ten Commandments? Is it because he is not upright in position or posture on the infallible teachings of Jesus Christ and His Church? Is it because he is evasive and is not straight, honest or moral in his allowing and promoting of the sacrilege of Communion for adulterer? Is it because he is limp, sagging, floppy and nonrigid in following the God-man Jesus Christ in the virile and courageous hard "narrow... way, which leads unto life and few there are that find i...

In last nights debate, even the far-left Socialist Bernie Sanders finally admitted that Nicholas Maduro is a "vicious tyrant." It appears that Francis is the last Western leader to still support the dictator Maduro. In June, the far-left National Catholic Reporter said "Maduro tried to claim he had the support of Pope Francis." (National Catholic Reporter, "Vatican supports new elections to solve Venezuelan crisis," June 15, 219) The leftist newspaper, like Sanders at the debate, appears to want to distance Francis from the "vicious tyrant," but Francis has never stated he doesn't support Maduro. In fact, in January, Francis in classic Argentinean Peronist equivocation said he still supported Maduro: "I support... the Venezuelan people... including those who are on one side [the Maduro tyranny] and the other [the freedom fighters]." (Catholic News Agency, "In leaked letter to 'Mr. Maduro,' Pope Francis reit...

Francis's book "Dialogos entre Juan Pablo II Y Fidel Castro" presents evidence that he is pro-Communist, anti-Capitalism and by inference Anti-American because the United States is the driving force behind the global free market system. He wrote on page 23 that there apparently could be a "convergence" of "premises" between Communism and Catholicism: "Fidel Castro offered a... convergence or points of connection between Catholicism and the premises (los postulados) of the [Cuban Communist] Revolution." However, later in the his book he states there cannot be a convergence of premises between Capitalism and Catholicism: You cannot hold the premises (los postulados) of "neoliberalismo" (Capitalism) and be considered a Christian. The failures of Marxism and Collectivism don't authorize the Capitalist system (al sistema capitalista)... we find in "neoliberalismo" (Capitalism) the opposite of the Gospel... because ...

Francis in his Spanish language book "Dialogos entre Juan Pablo II Y Fidel Castro" in what looks like a propaganda piece for Cuban Marxist totalitarianism apparently claimed that the Cuban Dictator Fidel Castro offered Pope John Paul II a "convergencias" or convergence, that is a moving towards unity, between "Christianity and Marxism." Francis, it seems, implies that a possible Marxist/Catholic convergence was what motivated John Paul to visit Cuba: "From 1990 when Fidel Castro offered a strategic alliance between Christianity and Marxism he has not ceased in his attempts to find and show convergence or points of connection between Catholicism and the postulates (premises) of the Revolution [capitalized by Francis]." "It was this eagerness that provoked the approach and motivated the historic visit of Pope John Paul II to the Caribbean island, President Castro expressed that both the Church and the Revolution of history have had many...

Frequent guest co-host on Dr. Taylor Marshall's YouTube TnT show Fr. David Nix stated he was a “resignationalist” : " Bishop Gracida of Texas is a great hero of mine for publicly questioning the valid resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.   I know for a fact that at least one other Cardinal in the world is questioning this, too.  But even if you do not buy our 'resignationalist' approach to the current crisis, then at least ask this:  Where are all the bishops denouncing the weekly heresy that we are now hearing from the top down?.. Here is why: The end does not justify the means, whether those means be sins of commission  or omission . Have you ever thought of the fact that sins of omission do not justify a good end?" (PadrePeregrino.org, "Courage over Consequentialism in the Hierarchy," March, 3, 2019) [ https://padreperegrino.org/2019/03/consequentialism/ ] Magnanimously, Marshall, who is 100 % against the “resignationalist” questioning of  the ...

"Since Vatican Council II, it has been the overwhelmingly prevalent view, especially among the Catholic hierarchy, that the Church must seek a new philosophical and theological basis for its teaching – an approach which will somehow bypass what is alleged to be the “intellectualism” of St. Thomas Aquinas..."   " This criticism of Thomism extends especially to the question concerning man’s “deification .” It is the contention of these same people that the “rigid” categories of thought, which they claim are inherent to Thomistic thinking, allow absolutely no room for any possible communication between God and man, that they destroy the basis for mystical prayer and contemplation, and thus ultimately negate any possibility for final union between God and man.'" " This long article is being written expressly to refute this position. It aims to prove that just the opposite is indeed the case – that it is the rejection of Thomism which is largely responsib...