10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace. The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Comments
The pontificate of Pope Francis, if he recognizes himself as a legitimate Roman Pontiff, must have a definitive sentence on the part of the Church, according to St. Thomas Aquinas, in order to be pointed out as a heretic: "In fact, heretics, schismatics and excommunicated persons are deprived of the exercise of their powers by a sentence of the Church (Summa Theologiae, Tertia Pars, Quaestio 82, Articulus 9, co.)".
Therefore, if some believe that this Pope is a heretic, but is a Pope, then one must still expect such a sentence. Unfortunately, they must continue in due "obedience to the Roman Pontiff" (Code of Canon Law, 751). That is, they must abide, for example, to "Amoris Laetitia". No one has the authority to judge him or disobey him, for that would be an act of schism against a Pope. Because that would prove to be rebellion and an unchristian attitude.
But this also reveals another big problem. The Church has defined papal infallibility, a definitive dogma by Pope Pius IX, and if Bergoglio is sentenced as a stubborn heretic, this would obviously be contradictory to this dogma; The article, however, does not have this problematic possibility.
The solution to get out of these impasses, in what was defined by the Church, is in the Declaration of Benedict XVI. And Bergoglio does not have the munus (office) obviously. Therefore it should be noted that what is written in the "Universi Dominici Gregis", in its articles 76 and 77. Because these articles authorize Catholics not to obey this non-legitimate Pope, since it is said that it is not necessary for a sentence from the Church.
The problem itself is not heresies of this pontificate, but that this pontificate has never been legitimate from the beginning. The solution proposed by the article is inconsistent, as it should be logical. All possibilities must be coherent in the face of a legitimate and real good Christian conscience, because all this must be addressed so that there is coherence with the truth.