Skip to main content

Ironic - Francis is definitely pope Feser: “Church..bec[a]me..divided between 3 papal contenders [two of which were antipopes]" vs. Francis is definitely pope Skojec: "couldn't believe the protection from error claims anymore"


“If God were protecting the Church, he wouldn’t have let it become largely Arian, or Monothelite, or divided between 3 papal contenders, or…” Oh wait, all these things were resolved, though things looked very bad at the time. Church history is bigger than one person’s lifetime.
Quote
Steve Skojec
@SteveSkojec
Many people are angry at me for leaving the Church as its leaders do things like this. I spent every day for years staring into this abyss, seeing a Church supposedly protected by God becoming increasingly evil until I couldn't believe the protection from error claims anymore. t.co/L8Zyiyp6ad
Show more

Comments

Renato said…
I think that the Church has always had the assistance of the Holy Spirit (and I think all Catholics should think so) in its history. Above all, when the Bride of Christ resembled her Bridegroom when she was persecuted, condemned, scourged and crucified on the Cross. That is, when she too, like Christ, was not recognized in our eyes (Isaiah 53).

Or should we love it when we are still on this earth only on Mount Tabor commemorating the Face of Christ transfigured by the Father? The answer is obviously no. Because the believer must love her faithfully, especially in all dramatic circumstances, otherwise this would not be a proof that we would really be faithful to Him or to Her.

And who am I, a nothing. I'm just a commenter who reads this blog. I by my own judgment, in the same context of the "perhaps" and the "probable", defined by myself a "sentence of the Church" and excluded myself from it. It is not up to us to be judges of anyone, much less of the Church. Because I am the example for spending four years away from the sacraments. Let me take you by bad examples that say that Bergoglio's Church is the mystical body of Satan. And I was like that, her accomplice... So let me be carried away by the subtlety of the Gnostic Serpent's suggestion that the Church was not good for me. Because I simply do not accept this legitimate pontificate, although I do not recognize it until the election of a new legitimate Roman Pontiff. In short, so that my comment does not get long, I returned to the sacraments and to my Mother Church recently.

I wish Martinez a Merry Christmas and to all who read this blog, but wishing you to always receive all the sacraments of the Church in a holy way.
Renato said…
Correction above: I do not recognize this pontificate as legitimate. I believe in the dogma of papal continuity, thus in the canonical intervention of the cardinals in order to re-elect a new Pope.
Fred Martinez said…
Merry Christmas Renato and all The Catholic Monitor readers.

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...