Skip to main content

Bishop Eleganti: Pope Francis’ comments..contradict the Gospel Anyone who wants to include everyone at the cost of relegating Christ to the background as the Son of God does not deserve the name ‘Christian.’

Bishop Eleganti: Pope Francis’ comments on other religions conceal Jesus and contradict the Gospel

Comments

Ivanmijeime said…
How can such a infidel then be called a pope?!
Can you explain that to us, your excellency?
10:13 AM
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
12:16 PM
Renato said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
12:20 PM
Renato said…
St. Robert Berllarmine says that a Roman Pontiff would cease to be "ipso facto" the Supreme Pontificate, from which he himself departs, and would also cease to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Therefore, in this case, the Church would not be judging a Pope, but an illegitimate Pope. The Church would only be removing an impostor from the Chair of St. Peter, because the office of Pope, of the Supreme Pontiff, is precisely to defend the Catholic faith, and not to betray it.

If the judgment is not about a Pope, then the election of the "Pope" was null and void from the beginning. For example, the candidate for Supreme Pontiff was a woman, or a demented, or an apostate, etc.

In Bergoglio's case, he is simply a false pope because Ratzinger has not abdicated the office. That is why he utters continual heresies to demonstrate that he does not have the assistance of the Holy Spirit.

It can be deduced from this article that the majority of cardinals and bishops know only that one cannot judge a Pope, as Berllarmine affirms that no one can judge him, because above a Roman Pontiff only God.

That is why Bergoglio can stay in Rome for more years.

It is also deduced that this bishop thus loses himself in the same way. Therefore, it is due to ignorance or negligence about this cause. The bishop lacks love for the truth.
12:33 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more