Skip to main content

Audio: "Bishop Rene Gracida believes, as do others, that this activity is canonically illegal under the promulgated laws in the 1996 Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, by St. John Paul II. If this is true, then the validity of the papal election may be in doubt"


#83: Pope Francis and the Crisis of Confusion—Bishop Rene Henry Gracida (video segment— full audio below)

A few minutes into my conversation with Bishop Gracida, bishop emeritus of Corpus Christi, TX, it becomes obvious that he is direct and to the point, evidently allergic to beating around the bush...

... In this regards, Bishop Gracida has some questions that fearlessly “go there.” What do I mean? The authorized biography of disgraced Godfried Cardinal Daneels of Belgium describes activities between and among cardinal electors, such as Cardinal Carlo Martini, Cardinal Achille Silvestrini, Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, and Cardinals Karl Lehmann and Walter Kasper—dubbed the St. Galen Mafia. These activities, verified by Austin Ivereigh in his hagiographic biography of Pope Francis, The Great Reformer: Francis and the Making Of a Radical Pope involve canvassing other electors to elect Jorge Cardinal Bergolio. Well…

Bishop Rene Gracida believes, as do others, that this activity is canonically illegal under the promulgated laws in the 1996 Apostolic Constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, by St. John Paul II. If this is true, then the validity of the papal election may be in doubt. You read that right.

https://www.patrickcoffin.media/pope-francis-and-the-crisis-of-confusion/][

Comments

Renato said…
I think this record that Pope John Paul II said to Bishop René Gracida about the Universi Dominici Gregis is important. Wojtila forbade anyone to appeal to "universal acceptance" or any other extrinsic principle of the Apostolic Constitution in order to discern an outcome.

This leads us to think that Universi Dominici Gregis is like a single game to play; I see this game as chess because it requires strategy from the players on the board in order to reach a final victory.

And in this same game there is a chess move that represents the end of the game. In this move, the king cannot be covered by any other piece on the board and neither can he move it to another square without being taken by an opponent's piece on the same board. This move is called checkmate.

Pope Benedict XVI used this move when he used Canon 332.2 in the Code of Canon Law, according to Universi Dominici Gregis. Ratzinger did not move the munus piece, but the ministry piece. If he only used the sheikh, the king would only be threatened, the king could escape from him. But when he resorts to checkmate, the king is cornered and so the game has come to an end.

That totally cornered reign belongs to Pope Francis.

This means that this move is sufficient to affirm, without error, that the 2013 conclave is totally invalid. Because there is no longer any need to investigate whether there was another irregularity in this same conclave.

That is why it is not necessary for anyone to look for an alternative against this illegitimate pontificate of Bergoglio. Because that person would be against the prohibition that Pope Wojtila revealed to Bishop Gracida.

All that is needed is for the legitimate cardinals, before the 2013 conclave, to recognize this and act.
8:24 AM
Renato said…
The Bishop asserts only that John Paul II, long in advance and legally, forbade anyone to resort to any alternative other than the Universi Dominini Gregis for a final result. It was not a confession to the bishop on the part of the pope, as I wrote above.
3:45 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more