Skip to main content

@barnes_law Newsflash: Trump is the one talking about vaccines and taking credit for the Covid vaccine. He thinks it's a political winner for 2024. That's what happens when you hire a Pfizer lobbyist to run your campaign.


Robert Barnes
@barnes_law
Subscribe
Newsflash: Trump is the one talking about vaccines and taking credit for the Covid vaccine. He thinks it's a political winner for 2024. That's what happens when you hire a Pfizer lobbyist to run your campaign.
Quote
Philip Anderson
@VoteBidenOut
Replying to @RealAlexJones
Now is NOT the time to talk shit about Trump over something from 5 years ago. We are fighting for our fucking lives in this election. After we defeat Biden in November complain about Trump all you want BUT NOT BEFORE !!!!!
Show more
23.7K
Views

Comments

Anonymous said…
Do you think that hie richie rich politicians who position themselves as supporters of religion but who otherwise contradict its teachings by their personal and public lives--do you think that maybe they position themselves that way for free and easy votes? Furthermore, is it remotely possible that these politicians could finance voices in the alternate media to shill for them?
5:52 AM
Renato said…
I think that even if Trump pursues the country's interest, he will be forced to yield to another interest. This becomes impossible to govern freely.

He demonstrated favorable to the pharmaceutical industry and today the arms industry. These industries are part of the same Zionist agenda that aims to destroy humanity.

Because he is committed to a Zionist Jewish messianic utopian mission, even though he claims that he desires the good of his country.

Bottom line: either he walks on the path favorable to the U.S., or he walks on the path favorable to Israel.

He will be sincere to everyone if he breaks with this commitment not aimed at his country.

8:14 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more