Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
https://www.timesofisrael.com/argentinas-far-right-president-elect-visits-lubavitcher-rebbes -grave/
In Javier Milei's Argentina, there is a controversy over a probable conspiracy theory called Plan Andinia. I personally think it makes sense if Kabballah is present on this controversy. And if this is confirmed, then something very nebulous for the future must happen in that country. So, it is necessary to pray a lot for the Argentines.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeEM6IODsro
One should pray both for the conversion of the Jews and for the conversion of Christopher Jon Bjerknes. The latter a scholar on the same subject who reveals cabalistic plans against humanity. Although he has a distorted view of Christ and the Church, he reveals truths that are unlikely to be seen in any other source.
Our Lord condemned the Kabballah, that is, the Tradition of the Ancients (Mark 7:10-13). And everything God did was good. Christ, therefore, came into the world out of love for all and to bear witness to the truth (John 18:37).