Skip to main content

Damage Control.."[Francis] Bergoglio will NOT EVER Return to Argentina..New Gov, There has PROMISED to Prosecute his Homosexual Henchman Clergy there. He BF. would be JAILED {pope or not) if he goes back there. on BiHis Cover up for Pardo Pulia Grassi Maccarine Sucunza,, Cocopalmeiro and Zanchetta is a SCANDAL there in Arg.., His glossing over this with Attacksshop Strictland , nLatin mass, AB Burke and Father Pavone is a Embarrassment by a DISGRACEFUL Bergoglio...

Damage Control

ANONYMOUS

He Bergoglio will NOT EVER Return to Argentina. The New Gov, There has PROMISED to Prosecute his Homosexual Henchman Clergy there. He BF. would be JAILED {pope or not) if he goes back there. His Cover up for Pardo Pulia Grassi Maccarine Sucunza,, Cocopalmeiro and Zanchetta is a SCANDAL there in Arg.., His glossing over this with Attacks on Bishop Strictland , nLatin mass, AB Burke and Father Pavone is a Embarrassment by a DISGRACEFUL Bergoglio F. To Say the Least.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think that the clashes between prelates and influential laity in the Catholic world over the crisis provoked by Bergoglio should be questioned a lot, but there is one very important fact being overlooked. There are questions among the same influential Catholics about his munus in the Church with various suggestions: universal acceptance, his misunderstanding of the Petrine munus, an imperfect council to judge him, an emergency suspension against him, etc. What strikes me most is not so much all this, but the need for the continuity of the papacy. The Universi Dominici Gregis says that the pope must abdicate the Petrine munus, but this required abdication was never made by Ratzinger. And Bergoglio was elected without the Petrine munus required by the same apostolic constitution. Thus Benedict XVI died while still pope on the last day of last year (this fact is about to complete a year ago). The Church today has the See of Rome vacant, but this important fact is still overlooked. The Universi Dominici Gregis places importance above any council or synod for the continuity of the papacy. Could it be that the continuity of Peter's pontificate is not above all this? If there is no longer a pope today, then there will be another Church tomorrow. There is no way for any Catholic to remedy this lapse, a continuity with a pope today without a Petrine office. And no one has the authority to convoke the next conclave, as the same

Renato
Anonymous said…
apostolic constitution teaches, except through John Paul II and Benedict XVI.

Renato
Anonymous said…
I only think so with these facts that many have taken the path of the Anti-Church. In this way, God's plans and the revival of the Church by Benedict XVI will be confirmed.

https://twitter.com/Sachinettiyil/status/1729340601760645177?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1729340601760645177%7Ctwgr%5E35a79fc46cde1593bc74ade9a93be377f0fac4b4%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwdtprs.com%2F

Renato

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...