Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
Comments
I’m old enough to remember when they told us we were going to freeze to death because of earth’s cooling and we couldn’t use aerosols any more because we had to close the hole in the atmosphere where all our warmth was escaping through 😂
With global warming they declared CO2 our enemy. More outrageous b.s.
I saw a video few weeks back that said exactly how much CO2 makes up the atmosphere…I had to look it up myself…It’s
.O4 percent!!!!