If Christ confirms the other apostles that his Vicar is Peter, then he would never lose the deposit of faith as Christ Himself later confirmed too. Because Peter represents that the true Church would never be destroyed by the forces of hell. This is part of the Catholic creed. Bergoglio does not fit in as Vicar of Christ, much less has the authority to change the deposit of faith. If we believe that Bergoglio is pope, then the forces of hell today have prevailed – in the example of the new golden calf at WYD which is the Gnostic agenda of welcoming everything and everyone, to the detriment of faith. So we can coldly come to the conclusion that many demonstrate a crisis of faith or have come to the total loss of it. If they don't see the obvious one, then much less have they seen the solution.
Renato
Anonymous said…
The impediment imposed on Benedict XVI's enemies to go out on the Chair of Peter was a call from Christ to accept the cross; in Peter's room, however, as he himself afterwards stated. This should be analyzed out of love for the pope and the Church. In Vatican II there was an resistant Catholic reflex, but not authentic. We discern true Catholics by examplefrom a St. Bernard or St. Catherine of Siena, because they were true sons of the pope: with examples, corrections and discernment in order to a solution offered by the Church. Because they knew that she never forsakes those children who seek her for love, for the history of the Church is always consistent with this. And And those inauthentic in the past continue the inauthentic legacy today. Because there are murmurings, lamentations, and even despair. Will there still be faith when the great tribulation comes?
Renato
Anonymous said…
In the first comment above it is written that it is part of the creed, though implicitly it is even true; But it's part of the faith, it's not a specific Catholic creed. In the second, the correct would be inauthentic by the past. That is, they would continue in the old mistake. I am sorry!
Comments
Renato
Renato
Renato