Skip to main content

Border Drowning Death Photo taken by La Jornada Correspondent whose Pro-Castro/Maduro Newspaper supports Leftist Oppression

Julia Le Duc, a correspondent for La Jornada according to Wikipedia, took the now famous photo of the border drowning deaths.

Most people in the United States don't know her newspaper is a extremist left-wing promoter of leftist oppressive regimes.

The pro-Marxist Mexican La Jornada editor Carmen Lira Saade is well-known to have been a promoter of the repressive regime of Dictator Fidel Castro while he was alive.

The Mexican newspaper, also, is an unabashed supporter of the Dictator Nicolas Maduro in his oppression and starvation of the Venezuelan people.

It seems very hypocritical for the pro-Marxist newspaper which has shown no concern for the numerous deaths brought about by the Cuban and Venezuelan regimes to suddenly be so concerned about the drowning of two people.

Also, how much credibility does this leftist newspaper which supports oppressive regimes have?

Can anyone trust their narrative?

Have any real journalists confirmed that the narrative of the border photo is not fake news?

Remember the last border photo of the Time's crying girl that was the biggest fake news of last year.

Is it possible that this leftist oppressive regime enablers might have staged the photo?

Pray an Our Father now for responsible parents to not put their children in danger.


Comments

Laramie Hirsch said…
Reminds me of that picture they took of that dead Turkish boy a couple of years ago.
Dad29 said…
You have hit on the real tragedy here, friend: the parent(s) are putting their children in horrible danger. It's one thing to endanger oneself for betterment of one's family. It's another thing entirely to endanger the entire family. Sad to say, I think this is "on the dad," no one else.
Georgia said…
Photo was staged no doubt about it-- they drowned in a fierce current and she ends up with her arm around him like that? Never happen -- the bodies had to be placed like that--Leftist ghouls taking advantage of a child's death to score political points and to use as propaganda -- they will literally stoop to anything....

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...