Skip to main content

Benedict says Pope Francis is "Profound" Philosopher, has X-Ray Vision & can Leap Tall Buildings in a Single Bound

The silliness of the Francis papacy has reached a new level.

The 90-year old Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI who in his last photo on October 2017 had a black eye (google the photo and do a close up of his face) and looked so feeble he appeared near death has according to the Vatican news agency just read 11 books by Francis as well as wrote a letter saying "Pope Francis is a man with profound philosophical and theological formation."

If Benedict did by some miracle read the 11 books and wrote the letter then he either has dementia or has lost his mind.

Vatican news agency please send a camera crew in so we can see the new Benedict who in just a few months is a new man full of gusto who can read 11 books of Francis's new found profound clarity of prose as well as profundity in theology and philosophy.

Let us see the full of gusto Benedict tell us before a camera about the new found profoundness of the present Pope.

Do a internet search of anyone and everyone who has read Francis's writings including those of his greatest admirers and you will not find a single writer that says he is a profound philosopher or theologian.

Even Pope Francis's favorite theologians such as Michel de Certeau or Gaston Fessard are second rate thinkers at best. I know because I have written articles on both of them.

Let's take the silliness to the next level.

Benedict wrote a letter saying Francis has x-ray vision and can leap tall buildings in single bound.

Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.

Update on March 13, 2017:

Today, the Vatican admitted that Benedict didn't read the eleven books and failed to explain why it didn't publish "the full text of the letter at yesterday's presentation" according to the National Catholic Register.

Also, the Vatican failed to respond to Fr. Z and others who say the letter doesn't sound like Benedict or to the question from the Register "for clarification of the letter and to explain what 'inner continuity' means."



Comments

Elizabeth said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
2:53 PM
jac said…
In my opinion, Benedict is playing a subtle game of irony.
We know that his comment about the "Chuch on the verge of capsizing" in his farewell letter for Card. Meisner's funerals was immediately followed by some harsh retaliation revelations in the media about his brother Fr Ratzinger's past with chidren.
Benedict was in close contact with Meisner, one of the four "dubbia cardinals" since he talked with him the day before he died.
Can anyone imagine for only one second which could be the heart of these talks if not about Francis and the horrible crisis the Church is currently undergoing?
1:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

If Francis is a Heretic, What should Canonically happen to him?

Did Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (the future Pope Benedict XVI) say that Francis is a heretic ?   On June 3, 2003 the then Cardinal Ratzinge r (and future Pope Benedict) , head of the Congregation for the Faith, said that the endorsement of  " homosex civil unions" was against Catholic teaching, that is heterodoxy : "Those who would move from tolerance to the legitimatization of specific rights for cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval or legalization of evil is something far different from the toleration of evil... The Church teaches that respect for homosexual persons cannot lead in any way to approval of homosexual behavior or to legal recognition of homosexual unions ." (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, "Considerations Regarding Proposals to give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons," June 3, 2003) Gloria.tv reported: " Francis made on October 21 his latest declaration in sup...
6 comments
Read more

A Hour which will Live in Infamy: 10:01pm November 3, 2020

10:01pm November 3, 2020, a hour which will live in infamy, the United States of America presidential electoral integrity was suddenly and deliberately attacked by the forces of the Democrat Machine and some corrupt collaborators within the Republican Party. It will be recorded that "under the pretense of COVID, executive branch officials across a number of key battleground states violated election procedures passed by the legislative branches of those states in a number of ways that opened up the process to fraud on a massive scale, never before seen in the history of this country" which makes it obvious that the attack was deliberately planned many days or even weeks before. During the time before and after the attack the Democrat Machine and its corrupt collaborators in the Media have deliberately sought to deceive the United States by false statements and expressions of hope for continued peace.  The attack on United States has caused severe damage to the Ameri...
Post a Comment
Read more

Could Francis be an Antipope even though the Majority of Cardinals claim he is Pope?

Is it possible for someone to be an antipope even though the majority of cardinals claim he is pope? The case of Antipope Anacletus II proves that it is possible for a majority of cardinals to claim a man is pope while he, in reality, is an antipope. In 1130, a majority of cardinals voted for Cardinal Peter Pierleone to be pope. He called himself Anacletus II. He was proclaimed pope and ruled Rome for eight years by vote and consent of a absolute majority of the cardinals despite the fact he was a antipope. In 1130, just prior to the election of antipope Anacletus, a small minority of cardinals elected the real pope: Pope Innocent II. How is this possible? St. Bernard said "the 'sanior pars' (the wiser portion)... declared in favor of Innocent II. By this he probably meant a majority of the cardinal-bishops." (St. Bernard of Clairvaux by Leon Christiani, Page 72) Again, how is this possible when the absolute majority of cardinals voted for A...
3 comments
Read more