One Peter Five's Steve Skojec has been joined by Francis apologist Catholic Culture's Dr. Jeff Mirus in his name-calling.
They are both calling everyone "sedevacantist" including Doctors of the Church who say a "Pope [who]... is explicitly a heretic" can "cease to be pope" by the Church establishing and declaring that he is a manifest heretic.
Mirus inferred that Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales is sedevacantist for saying a explicit heretic pope can "cease to be pope."
(Catholic Culture, "Sede Vacantism: An attack on the Church's Authority Principle," November 21, 2019)
Mirus is now officially a collaborator of Skojec in calling everyone a sedevacantist who shows evidence that Francis is in heresy for making Communion for adulterer his "authentic Magisterium" teaching or showing evidence that the Francis conclave was invalid.
Mirus was already a official member of the leftist Mark Shea heretical party of Communion for adulterer which became a ally of Skojec in adopting his name-calling tactic.
They are even calling Cardinal Raymond Burke a sedevacantist if he doesn't submit to Francis and accept the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers as well as disagree with St. Francis de Sales' teachings.
The Adultererist heretics are the allies of Skojec claiming that it is impossible for Francis to "cease to be pope" for teaching explicit manifest heresy and it is impossible for a supposed pope to be a antipope despite any evidence.
Ironically, the Mark Shea clone Mike Lewis even proves that Francis obstinately doubts and denies the infallible dogma of the Seventh Commandment "Thou shalt not commit adultery" thus making him a explicit heretic:
"Burke has rejected... [the Communion for adulterers] guidelines of the Buenos Aires bishops which was explicitly promulgated as authentic Magisterium by Pope Francis."
(wherepeteris.com, "Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an Antipope?", September 25, 2019)
The Adultererist heretics apparently don't think the Ten Commandments are infallible Catholic dogma.
Since Skojec appears to think with his Adultererist allies that it is historically impossible for a supposed pope to be a antipope even if his conclave was invalid contrary to Catholic history and that it is absolutely impossible for a explicitly heretical pope to "cease to be pope":
Will he join his allies in calling for Cardinal Burke to be a called a sedevacantist?
Remember, while Skojec will deny that he is formally for Communion for adulterers, his teachings on Francis while not formally Adultererist supports the Adultererist heresy.
Or, is it possible that he can overcome his opinions on Francis that support the Adulterist heresy by joining Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales in calling on Cardinal Burke to issue the formal correction on Francis's Communion for adulterers explicit heresy?
St. Francis de Sales proclaimed:
"The Pope... when he is EXPLICITLY A HERETIC... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
They are both calling everyone "sedevacantist" including Doctors of the Church who say a "Pope [who]... is explicitly a heretic" can "cease to be pope" by the Church establishing and declaring that he is a manifest heretic.
Mirus inferred that Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales is sedevacantist for saying a explicit heretic pope can "cease to be pope."
(Catholic Culture, "Sede Vacantism: An attack on the Church's Authority Principle," November 21, 2019)
Mirus is now officially a collaborator of Skojec in calling everyone a sedevacantist who shows evidence that Francis is in heresy for making Communion for adulterer his "authentic Magisterium" teaching or showing evidence that the Francis conclave was invalid.
Mirus was already a official member of the leftist Mark Shea heretical party of Communion for adulterer which became a ally of Skojec in adopting his name-calling tactic.
They are even calling Cardinal Raymond Burke a sedevacantist if he doesn't submit to Francis and accept the sacrilege of Communion for adulterers as well as disagree with St. Francis de Sales' teachings.
The Adultererist heretics are the allies of Skojec claiming that it is impossible for Francis to "cease to be pope" for teaching explicit manifest heresy and it is impossible for a supposed pope to be a antipope despite any evidence.
Ironically, the Mark Shea clone Mike Lewis even proves that Francis obstinately doubts and denies the infallible dogma of the Seventh Commandment "Thou shalt not commit adultery" thus making him a explicit heretic:
"Burke has rejected... [the Communion for adulterers] guidelines of the Buenos Aires bishops which was explicitly promulgated as authentic Magisterium by Pope Francis."
(wherepeteris.com, "Does Cardinal Burke think Francis is an Antipope?", September 25, 2019)
The Adultererist heretics apparently don't think the Ten Commandments are infallible Catholic dogma.
Since Skojec appears to think with his Adultererist allies that it is historically impossible for a supposed pope to be a antipope even if his conclave was invalid contrary to Catholic history and that it is absolutely impossible for a explicitly heretical pope to "cease to be pope":
Will he join his allies in calling for Cardinal Burke to be a called a sedevacantist?
Remember, while Skojec will deny that he is formally for Communion for adulterers, his teachings on Francis while not formally Adultererist supports the Adultererist heresy.
Or, is it possible that he can overcome his opinions on Francis that support the Adulterist heresy by joining Doctor of the Church St. Francis de Sales in calling on Cardinal Burke to issue the formal correction on Francis's Communion for adulterers explicit heresy?
St. Francis de Sales proclaimed:
"The Pope... when he is EXPLICITLY A HERETIC... the Church must either deprive him or as some say declare him deprived of his Apostlic See."
(The Catholic Controversy by St. Francis de Sales, Pages 305-306)
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
Comments