Does Anti-Open Letter Fr. Harrison Believe that Vatican II gives the Satanic Temple the "Right to Abortion" because of the "Right to Freedom"?
Fr. Brian Harrison in his latest attack on the Open Letter, in his defense of Pope Francis's religious indifferentism in the Abu Dhabi statement, said:
"Since, according to Vatican II teaching... Dignitatis Humanae... the truth or falsity of the religion we profess does not in itself affect our right to freedom from governmental or social harassment."
(The Wanderer, "Pope Francis: The Charge of Formal Heresy," May, 14, 2019)
Does Harrison believe that Vatican II gives satanic-like children sacrificing Baal religions the "right to freedom"?
Do the teachings of Vatican II mean that Rome was wrong to destroy the child sacrificing religion of Moloch?
Does religious freedom mean that G. K. Chesterton was wrong to socially harass the memory of the religion of Baal? Chesterton said:
[W]orshippers of Baal or Moloch... a religion of despair... fell [by the hands of Rome]... to its logical conclusion [of] her own vision of the universe. Moloch had eaten his children."
Or, in 2019, does he think Vatican II gives the Satanic Temple the "right to abortion" because of religious freedom?:
""A member of the Satanic Temple in Missouri is challenging a state law... [on] abortion... saying it violates the member's religious freedom."
(Associated Press, "Satanic Temple challenges Missouri abortion law," April 10, 2019)
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
"Since, according to Vatican II teaching... Dignitatis Humanae... the truth or falsity of the religion we profess does not in itself affect our right to freedom from governmental or social harassment."
(The Wanderer, "Pope Francis: The Charge of Formal Heresy," May, 14, 2019)
Does Harrison believe that Vatican II gives satanic-like children sacrificing Baal religions the "right to freedom"?
Do the teachings of Vatican II mean that Rome was wrong to destroy the child sacrificing religion of Moloch?
Does religious freedom mean that G. K. Chesterton was wrong to socially harass the memory of the religion of Baal? Chesterton said:
[W]orshippers of Baal or Moloch... a religion of despair... fell [by the hands of Rome]... to its logical conclusion [of] her own vision of the universe. Moloch had eaten his children."
Or, in 2019, does he think Vatican II gives the Satanic Temple the "right to abortion" because of religious freedom?:
""A member of the Satanic Temple in Missouri is challenging a state law... [on] abortion... saying it violates the member's religious freedom."
(Associated Press, "Satanic Temple challenges Missouri abortion law," April 10, 2019)
Pray an Our Father now for the restoration of the Church.
Comments